Man is born with a moral sense which enables him to differentiate between right
and wrong. Without subjecting behaviour to a common standard of vice and virtue,
social evolution is not possible. This is the reason that even the primitive
societies had words which denoted difference between good and bad.
All societies did not practise universal standards of vice and virtue, yet it is
well known that almost all communities knew what was good and bad. For example,
mutual fidelity of consorts, speaking the truth, keeping promises, respecting
family ties, helping the poor and weak, were considered signs of good morality.
Of course, morality cannot be coded but its rules are well understood. From this
attitude arose the famous maxim: "Do not do to others what you do not want to be
done to yourself."
It means that you must wish others what you wish for yourself. Since every one
desires security of person and property, liberty to worship, fair trial, freedom
of speech etc., these facts, over a period of time, rose to become what is called
Human Rights. He who violates these rights is held the enemy of humankind.
When Islamic morality is judged by universal standards, this Arabian religion fails
to qualify as the friend and guide of humanity. In fact, it constitutes a major
threat to the survival of human race. I have no doubt that the Muslims will protest
against this point of view, and as usual, will produce far- fetched and irrational
evidence to prove that Islam advocates love and brotherhood of mankind. This type
of sorcery has worked wonders for Muslim fundamentalists in the past, but with
the dissemination of knowledge, it is difficult to cloud the truth with the magic
of misinterprelation, marvel of mesmerisation and mysticism of meaninglessness.
Islam has become a set of fundamentals which preach social segregation, hatred of
non-Muslims and elimination of dissenters through dominance, death and destruction.
These conclusions, no matter how true, cannot be palatable to the Muslims and
therefore rank as fabrications, from their standpoint. I can do no better than
quote from the Koran to decide the issue. Examine the following for yourself:
1. "Do not let non-Muslims enter mosques. They will go to hell." ( Repentance: 17 )
2. "O ye who believe! The non-Muslims are unclean. So let them not come near the Inviolable Place of Worship." (Repentance: 28)
3. "O ye who believe! Murder those of the disbelievers .... and let them find harshness in you." (Repentance: 123)
4. "Humiliate the non-Muslims to such an extent that they surrender and pay tribute." (Repentance: 29)
5. "O believers, do not treat your fathers and brothers as your friends, if they prefer unbelief to belief, whosoever of you takes them for friends, they are evil-doers." (Repentance: 20)
6. "Certainly, God is an enemy to the unbelievers." ( The Cow: 90 )
7. "God has cursed the unbelievers, and prepared for them a blazing hell." ( The Confederates 60 )
8. "Let not the believers take the unbelievers for friends.... whoso does that belongs not to God." (The House of Imram: 60)
9. "O believers, do not make friends with the Jews and Christians; ..whoso of you makes them his friend is one of them." (The Table: 55)
10. "The believers indeed are brothers." ( Apa rtments: 10 )
11. "Moslems are hard against the unbelievers, merciful to one another." (Victory: 25)
A Muslim naturally believes in all such Koranic verses, which determine his social
outlook and he becomes a narrow- minded sectarian. This psychological approach is
the fountain of fundamentalism. It is a myth to say that Islam advocates good
relationship with the People of the Book, that is, the Jews and Christians. What
I have said at 9 above supports this statement. If this were not enough, one could
refer the matter to HADITH, the sayings of the Prophet: Chapter LXXI of SAHIH
MUSLIM clearly states that since Islam is the religion for the entire humanity,
it abrogates all other faiths. To illustrate the point further, the hadith
no.285 asserts that any Jew or Christian who has heard of Muhammad but does not
believe in him, will become "one of the denizens of Hell-Fire."
The Islamic fundamentalism has become the foundation of Islamic morality.
What makes it a threat to human survival is the fact that it is not a passive
approach but advocates active aggression to impose itself on the unbelievers.
Why? It gives several reasons for this. Let me quote two:
1. "Muslims are the best of all nations." (House of Imram: 110). Obviously,
the best nation is superior to other people, who must wear the yoke of
2. The Prophet Muhammad has been sent by God with "the religion of Truth,
that He may cause it to prevail over all religions.." (Private Apartments: 28)
Simply stated it means that Muslims are superior to non-Muslims and have the
birth-right to dominate them. This is why Islam calls itself DIN-E-GHALIB, the
religion of dominance.
As every student of psychology knows, the purpose of any fundamentalism is to
secure blind following from its adherents. This is possible only when they are
conditioned to a certain object or goal which begins to rank as the sole purpose
of their lives. As a result, the purpose begins to overrule the method of
acquisition; whatever secures it is good and whatever obstructs it is bad. In
a nutshell, people must stop thinking for themselves, especially in terms of
morality. As the Marxists brainwashed people in the name of proletarianism and
what it stood for, the Muslims have been conditioned to the person of the
Prophet Muhammad, who is projected as the Saviour of his followers, having
complete power to find them permanent residence in paradise, which is the abode
of luxury, love making and lasciviousness. Since Muslims, in most countries are
deprived, depressed and desolated, they are prepared to do anything to uphold
the honour of the Prophet. For total obedience, they are at liberty to indulge
in the most convenient morality such as mendacity, rape, murder, theft and
treason without losing their chance of entering the paradise which has been
absolutely guaranteed by their faith in the Prophet Muhammad.
A corollary of this belief is the oppression of non-Muslims by the Muslims,
who deny human rights to the unbelievers for upholding the Islamic precepts
in relation to the infidels. As a result, non-Muslims are discouraged to live
in the Muslim countries even if they have originally belonged to their
ancestors. It is justified on the precedent that the Prophet Muhammad expelled
all Jews and unbelievers from Arabia. The modern example is that of Pakistan,
the original home of the Hindus. There were millions of non-Muslims in this
land before partition of India but as Pakistan came into being they all were
thrown out through malice, mutilation and massacre. On the contrary, over
100,000,000 Muslims live in India and demand human rights! In Islamic countries,
the non-Muslim minorities are either non-existent or very tiny indeed. This
strangulation of human rights has become a part of the Islamic morality.
Since Islam is the Din-e-Ghalib i.e. the religion of dominance by God's will,
Muslim minorities in non-lslamic countries do everything possible to harass,
humiliate and harangue the host countries to practise their faith and culture.
The "Muslim Parliament" of Great Britain is an example in point. In fact, this
coterie of a few hundred Muslim fanatics, is a mockery of the British tolerance
and hospitality. Its major role is to collect donations from its adherents,
forbid Muslims to seek identification with Great Britain and practise all
rules of Islamic intolerance towards the host community. There is no concept
of parliamentary government in Islam, whatever, yet these hatred-mongers have
set up this association in the Land of Magna Carta, dedicated to liberty.
It is only a matter of time before the British government take notice of its
evil influence on the British culture, causing problems also for those who
have adopted the British ways and are proud to be sincere citizens of this land.
Use of violence for securing worldly goal and terrorisation of non-Muslims
are the pillar of Islamic morality. It is done through:
1. secular laws which are made in the name of Islam, and
2. the laws which Allah has framed and require no legislative authority and
Now, let us ponder over these two points:
1a. Islam declares Muhammad the greatest of all prophets and therefore reserves
the highest reverence for him. This has become an article of faith. A Muslim,
unwilling to force it on others, is considered deficient in belief. As a result,
every Muslim looks for an opportunity to demonstrate the magnitude of his
faith by molesting non-Muslims, and even fellow-believers who express less
bigotory in this field. Politicians have seized upon this emotional condition
of the Muslim mind to enhance their grip on power. For example, Pakistan has
passed TOHEEN-E-RASUL ACT (Contempt of Prophet's Act), which prescribes
death for insulting the Prophet Muhammad. Such an Act has never been passed in
the world of Islam during the last fourteen centuries; nor is there any religious
justification for it. In fact such a law in itself is a gross contempt of the
Prophet, who wanted to be known as the Blessing for mankind. A person who is
so conscious of himself cannot be the Blessing for lacking tolerance and
understanding of the human behaviour. Yet they have done it to terrorise the
dissidents and non-Muslims. The treatment of the Qadiyanis and Christians in
Pakistan, speak for itself. In fact, it is an ambassador of moral perversion
which is an echo of the European Inquisition conducted by the Christian clerics
to defend the holiness of their saviour, Jesus Christ.
This Islamic exploitation of the believers has led to their moral bankruptcy,
and this fact is well demonstrated by what happened in Pakistan during the
middle of April, 1994:
Hafiz Sajjad Tariq of Gujranwala in Pakistan, accidentally dropped a copy of
the Koran in a fireplace. As it caught fire, people of the locality became
aflame with rage. Not caring that Sajjad was a pious Muslim devoted to exalt
holiness of the Scripture (Koran), they alleged that he had desecrated the
Word of God. As mullahs of the area heard of it, they instantly issued Fatwas
of apostacy against Sajjad. Like hawks, the fundamentalists swooped down on him,
each hoping that his blow would despatch the victim to hell assuring him
(the assailant) a seat in paradise. As they were hitting him, someone shouted
that he was being dished out an un-Islamic punishment because he must be
stoned to death. By then, they had broken his ribs and he was not able to
walk. A gallant police officer intervened and locked him up with a view to
saving him from mob-violence. As the news spread, a large crowd of frenzied
Muslims appeared before the local police-station demanding his immediate
release. The Police Inspector, instead of enforcing the law, fell for the
temptation of establishing himself as the champion of Islam and handed Sajjad
to the attackers. They started stoning him mercilessly and thereafter set
his body on fire. If this were not enough, they tied his corpse to a powerful
motor-cycle and dragged it through the streets for two hours! After a pious
show of Islamic morality, they felt that they had done enough to avenge the
honour of the Prophet whom the Koran had been revealed.
This type of Islamic morality is rampant, not only in the Islamic countries,
but also in the lands where the Muslims have settled in sufficient numbers.
To explain this point, I may quote Britain where I live. I wrote and published
a book: "Eternity" in 1990. It challenges the basic concept of revelation,
the foundation of prophethood. As the Muslim organisations heard about it,
they individually and severally issued a fatwa condemning me to death.
Neither have they given me a chance to explain myself before a properly
constituted tribunal of justice nor have they accepted my challenge for a
public debate. Its consequences have been painful to me and my family.
What I have stated above roughly deleneates the Islamic morality in relation
to legislated law. Now, I may briefly touch upon the second part of the issue
i.e. the direct commands of Allah which are so evident that they need not be
2a. Jehad is one of them, and forms an integral part of the Islamic morality.
It is an open behest to murder, pillage, rape and create widows and
orphans for imposing Islam's will on the unbelievers, who are considered His
worst enemies just for the "sin" of unbelief. Yet, muslims call Allah the
Independent (SAMAD), All-Compassionate, All-Powerful and Creator of the
How can Allah sanction the destruction of innocent people?
Instead of delving into this mystery, I hasten to add that Jehad or violence
is considered holy by Islam, who, in return for persecuting, pillaging and
paralysing the infidels declares:
"Allah has bought from the faithful theirselves and their belongings against
the gift of paradise; they fight in the way of Allah; they kill and are
killed.." (Repentance: 110)
A HADITH ( the saying of the Prophet Muhammad ) declares: "Know that Paradise
is under the shades of swords." (Sahih Bokhari, Ch. 22: 73 )
What is paradise? The Muslim scholars are usually embarrassed by this question
and pretend that it is not physical but a condition of the mind. The above
Koranic verse clearly states that it is a definite exchange i.e. offer of
paradise for killing a non-Muslim or getting killed in the process of obeying
this divine command. The paradise is the main temptation for practising Islam.
This is the reason that the Koran explains it well. Paradise is the description
of the luxurious surroundings dwelt in by Houris and Ghilman. Houris are
the most beautiful ever-young virgins with wide, flexing eyes and swelling
bosoms. Ghilman are the immortal young boys, pretty like pearls, clothed
in green silk and brocade and embellished with bracelets of silver.
Allah shall give every believing man no fewer than seventy houris and many
ghilmans. To make sure that the lucky fellow can cope with them, Allah will
increase his virility a hundred-fold! This is the ultimate goal of the Islamic
morality, and it is why that the Muslims, who are usually depressed, are ready
to practise convenient morality based on violence. Even more potent factor in
this field is their staunch belief in the intercessory powers of the Prophet
Muhammad, which means that he has the authority to accommodate his followers
in paradise irrespective of what they may have done.
Taken from http://www.faithfreedom.org/Articles/AnwarSheikh/islamic_morality.htm (Note: We do not necessarily endorse this site or its views.)